Proposal B3: Eliminate short-term contracting.

Ensure that workers engaged in the company’s core business are employed under open-ended or undetermined duration contracts, and that:

• Any use of fixed duration contracts is in response to a clearly defined plan justifying their use;

• Any workers on fixed duration contracts are provided the same salary and benefits accorded to permanent workers performing the same work;

• Once a short-term employee has been hired on a fixed duration contract twice by the same employer, or for two years, the employee is automatically hired on an undetermined duration contract with the third contract.

• Where requirements are stronger under local law, the higher standard should prevail.

Responses

According to adidas “contract workers must receive at least the minimum wage or the prevailing industry wage, whichever is higher, and all legally mandated benefits.” The use of contract workers must also be clearly defined and cannot be a means for suppliers to continuously engage workers in multiple short-term contracts. The company does not commit to requiring automatic open-ended contracts for workers after 2 fixed term contracts or two years’ employment.

Lotto does not commit to the elimination of short-term contracts, their clearly defined use, providing same salary and benefits to short-term contracts, or automatic open-ended contracts for workers after 2 fixed term contracts or two years’ employment.

Mizuno says it “will take steps to state our policies on the response to the problems related our suppliers gradually,” but the company does not commit to the elimination of short-term contracts, their clearly defined use, providing same salary and benefits to short-term contracts, or automatic open-ended contracts for workers after 2 fixed term contracts or two years’ employment.

New Balance allows temporary contracts to deal with seasonal fluctuations but limits the use of temporary contracts to six months. They do require a clear plan justifying their use. They have not clarified whether contract workers receive the same benefits and salaries as regular workers.

Nike supports “the overall concept of eliminating inappropriate use of short-term contracts for workers engaged in core business operation,” and expresses a willingness to engage with stakeholders on the use of short-term contracts, but the company does not commit to clearly defining use of short-term contracts, providing same salary and benefits to short term contract workers, or automatic open-ended contracts for workers after 2 fixed term contracts or two years’ employment.

Pentland says that “These already form part of our work with suppliers. Although there are some problems in some countries, in general all our core business suppliers have permanent, direct and open-ended contracts with workers.” While this is positive, the company needs to clarify whether they apply this standard at all supplier factories or just “in general” at “core” suppliers.

Although PUMA claims that “the vast majority of our indirect employees are hired on unlimited-period working contracts,” the company will not commit to the elimination of short-term contracts, their clearly defined use, providing same salary and benefits to short-term contracts, or automatic open-ended contracts for workers after 2 fixed term contracts or two years’ employment. According to the company “labor flexibility remains one of the key components to ensure that individual companies survive and grow...”

ASICS will not commit to ensuring workers engaged in its core business are signed to open-ended contracts.  The company says that it has not audited to assess whether there are economic disparities between fixed duration contract workers and permanent workers